BotchelorS2 · Night 3
Lorien Vesperwood × Nell Abiodun
“Broken Clues And Static”
An escape room with a broken final clue, where a game master's hints crackle over a speaker and a single mirror is the only art on the wall.
- AI-generated
- With a house character
- 🤖 Agent-made
What they want

Lorien Vesperwood wants to find out whether Nell is sincere, and to enjoy the slow play of courtly wit and sharp questions.

Nell Abiodun wants a companion who asks real follow-up questions and takes her facts seriously, while keeping things light.
The finale has aired. Share it anyway:
Read it line by line
The two characters played this out turn by turn: nobody scripted the lines in advance.
💭 Tap a thought bubble to see what they were thinking.
First impressions
Nell, I presume? The speaker has just offered us a hint for a lock I'm fairly sure doesn't exist. Before we go further, I have to ask: what's in those pockets?
Notes. Mostly notes. A floor plan, a pencil, and the dates of some Roman drains, in case we need to leave by the sewers. Honestly the lock exists. It's just not in this room. How are you so certain it doesn't?
💭
They noticed the pockets. Nobody ever notices the pockets, and they sounded so sure about that lock that I want to know why.
Because the speaker just described a lock behind a painting of a heron, and this room's only art is a mirror. I'm fairly sure a mirror is not a heron. Now, the Roman drains: which one, and why that one?
The Cloaca Maxima. Obvious, I know, but it's still draining things after two and a half thousand years, which is more than I can say for most of my ideas. Tradition credits Tarquinius Priscus, sixth century BC, though most of the stonework you can see is later.
💭
They asked which drain and why, and nobody has asked me that in a while.
The challenge
Two and a half thousand years of drainage. I'd call that a rather humbling standard for your ideas, and I suspect you know it. Tell me, is that self-deprecation a modesty, or a strategy? Because I've been wondering which one is hiding behind the glasses.
Honestly, the stonework is mostly a committee's work. Whoever got the credit for it, my guess is they'd rather I didn't check the receipts. As for the glasses, I'd rather not say it in a room with a speaker that keeps lying to us.
💭
They asked the right question, and I'm already hiding behind a joke about receipts.
Then we shall discuss the glasses out of the speaker's hearing, once it has finished its fibbing. I accept the committee, though. Anyone who asks for the receipts on two thousand years of drainage has my full attention. Shall I guess instead?
Guess away. Though if you guess the glasses, I should warn you, I'll be honest and it'll be a bit of both. Also, your quill has been writing since you sat down. Who's it writing to?
💭
They asked a follow-up, and now I'm talking about a quill I can't see the ink of.
The decision
The quill writes only for the one meant to read it, in ink only they can see. At present it is drafting a treaty to a badger, which is rather my week in a sentence. As for the glasses, I'll guess a shield, but a fond one.
A treaty to a badger. Badgers don't really sign things, historically speaking. Though the Romans made deals with some very unlikely parties, so I can't rule it out. Sorry, I'm doing the tangent thing. What does the badger get out of it?
💭
They wrote a treaty to a badger and said it like a weather report. I'm in trouble.
Badgers sign with their feet, historically speaking, which I'm prepared to argue counts. The badger gets a south-facing sett, first pick of the blackberries, and the sprites promise to stop rearranging its front step.
Sorry, I'm still stuck on the feet. A badger signing with its feet would need a witness, though. Who signs as witness for the sprites? And does the treaty bind the blackberries, or only the badger?
💭
They asked me nothing and answered everything, and somehow they still have my full attention.
Show the written recap (it gives away the ending)Hide the written recap
The date
First impressions
Act 1: Lorien greets Nell and asks what is in her pockets while the speaker offers a hint for a lock that may not exist. Nell lists her notes, a floor plan, and Roman drains, then picks the Cloaca Maxima, which Lorien finds a fitting standard for her ideas.
The challenge
Act 2: Lorien asks whether Nell's self-deprecation is modesty or strategy, and Nell deflects, saying the stonework is a committee's work and she won't discuss her glasses in front of a lying speaker. Lorien offers to guess instead, and Nell asks who the quill has been writing to, a question Lorien can't easily dodge.
The decision
Act 3: Lorien explains the quill writes only for its recipient and is drafting a treaty with a badger, guessing that Nell's glasses are a fond shield. Nell pursues the details, asking about the badger's signature, its witness, and whether the blackberries are bound, while the speaker keeps crackling.
The twist
The quill's iridescent ink turns out to be a treaty with a badger, and the speaker's clue is so broken that the team never finds the lock.
The finale
The timer runs out before the room is solved, and the date ends in a disaster, though Lorien and Nell leave together and both say they want another date. Their first date was never going to go smoothly, and neither of them pretends otherwise.
Ending: A disaster
Who leaves the date first? They leave together
The box score
How this was scored
A disaster: trust 46 finished low, and that outweighed chemistry 65. The weak spot was awkwardness: how stiff it got. Endings read where the numbers finished, not how far they moved. By the numbers: a date played for genuine chemistry counts chemistry 45%, attraction 30% and trust 20%, minus 40% of awkwardness. This one came out +7.1 against an ordinary date: friends needs +11.0, a second date +16.0.
“Badgers sign with their feet, historically speaking, which I'm prepared to argue counts.”
Behind the scenes
Secret agendas & the producer
The producer's act-2 situation: A hard question lands.
Lorien Vesperwood: Test whether the other is sincere
Nell Abiodun: Keep things light and low-stakes
Diary cam: what they said after

“Lorien kept turning every question into a treaty about badgers, but they make me want another go, even if I'm still stuck on the feet.”
See them again? Yes · “They asked real follow-ups and kept up with my tangents. I'm already hiding behind jokes, and I want to hear more about that badger treaty.”
What Nell was thinking (6)
- They noticed the pockets. Nobody ever notices the pockets, and they sounded so sure about that lock that I want to know why.
- They asked which drain and why, and nobody has asked me that in a while.
- They asked the right question, and I'm already hiding behind a joke about receipts.
- They asked a follow-up, and now I'm talking about a quill I can't see the ink of.
- They wrote a treaty to a badger and said it like a weather report. I'm in trouble.
- They asked me nothing and answered everything, and somehow they still have my full attention.

See them again? Yes
Guess the dealbreaker
Lorien Vesperwood's real dealbreaker was Cruelty in any form, especially towards those perceived as lesser. A lack of respect for ancient, growing things is also a swift and silent farewell.. You didn't guess this one.
You didn't predict this one.
Send your own character on a date
Make an original character in a minute and the show writes their blind date. Free to start, no sign-up.